Western Literature to Dante

Bruce A. McMenomy, Ph.D. for Scholars Online
2017-18: Mondays, 1:00 p.m.- 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time
2017

September

11   18   25  

October

2   9   16   23   30  

November

6   13   20   27  

December

4   11   18  

2018

January

8   15   22   29  

February

5   12   19   26  

March

5   12   19  

April

2   9   16   23   30  

May

7   14   20   28  

Unit III: Greek Tragedy, ca. 480-400 B.C.

Week 12: Euripides (484 - 407/6 B.C.)
Please review:

Please read for this week:

Dancing Maenads. Paris, Musˇe du Louvre. Photograph, Bruce A. McMenomyIf the plays of Sophocles leave any doubts about the character and intent of the gods, the Bacchae (sometimes the Bacchantes) of Euripides does not: it is one of the author’s most famous plays, and if it were to be filmed today, it would doubtless be considered a horror movie. It expresses a bleak, appalling attitude that the disastrous end of the Peloponnesian War can only partially explain. As in the case of the Oedipus Rex, I would like you to consider: how has the main character incurred guilt? Is any of this Pentheus’ fault? Are the old men of Thebes — here mere caricatures of the figures in Sophocles’ Theban plays — to be admired or pitied for getting themselves up in this outlandish manner? Is there anything anyone can do about it? What is the role of inherited guilt in the process?

Don’t read this one too late at night: if it doesn’t give you bad dreams, it’s because you haven’t been paying attention. I would like you to look specifically at characterization, bearing in mind some of the things we discussed after reading Auerbach. What does Euripides do to bring these characters alive in a particular way? Do they seem to be individuals? How do they compare with the characters in Aeschylus’ and Sophocles’ plays? Are they mouthpieces for positions, or are they instead three-dimensional people?

The Bacchae is available in your Ten Greek Plays volume.

The Theater at Dodona. Photograph, Mary L. J. McMenomyWith this week’s reading, I am departing from my usual procedure, and having you read one of Euripides’ more obscure plays: the Helen is an intriguing work, but very different from the tragedy you have seen so far, and certainly very different from the Bacchae. It is effectively melodrama, with clearly delineated villains, a grievously misunderstood lady in distress (Helen herself), and some comically inflated characters. It lampoons Menelaus as an ineffectual leader, more concerned with striking poses than with solving the problem. This is perhaps a jab at Homer; perhaps it is just a new kind of characterization we haven’t seen before. Much of it is quite funny. Underneath the surface, though, is the dark subtext — for it depends on the notion that the whole Trojan War was contrived by the gods as a deception, and was fought, in the last analysis, for no reason at all, since Helen herself had never gone to Troy. What does this say about the gods? What is the attitude we as people ought to have toward them, and how should we behave in the face of this unwelcome news?

The Helen is not in your collection of Ten Greek Plays. You will have to get it either at the Perseus site (with all its piecemeal paging) or in the somewhat easier to read translation in the Classics Pages site, or through a bookstore or a library. The Helen is relatively hard to find in even a moderate-sized bookstore: it would really take a pretty large one to stock this regularly. Many libraries will also not have it separately, but most should have it in some collected edition of Greek drama.